<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim Romp Home Loans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timromp.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timromp.com</link>
	<description>I'm Your Go-To Guy For Questions About Mortgage Financing in the Greater DC Area.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Rush To Refinance That ARM &#8212; It May Be Adjusting To 3 Percent Or Lower</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/10/dont-rush-to-refinance-that-arm-it-may-be-adjusting-to-3-percent-or-lower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/10/dont-rush-to-refinance-that-arm-it-may-be-adjusting-to-3-percent-or-lower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Refinancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 

If your mortgage is set to adjust this year, the smart move may be to let it. Today&#8217;s conforming mortgages are adjusting lower than ever before &#8212; as low as 3 percent.  It may not be what you expected when you signed for your ARM several years ago.
The reason why ARMs are adjusting lower is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Don" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10117"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="border: black 1px solid;" title="Pending ARM Adjustment March 2010" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/pending-arm-adjustment-201002.jpg" alt="Pending ARM Adjustment March 2010" width="450" height="411" /></p>
<p>If your mortgage is set to adjust this year, the smart move may be to let it. Today&#8217;s conforming mortgages are adjusting lower than ever before &#8212; as low as 3 percent.  It may not be what you expected when you signed for your ARM several years ago.</p>
<p>The reason why ARMs are adjusting lower is because of how they&#8217;re made.</p>
<p>When conforming adjustable-rate mortgages adjust, they adjust according to a pre-determined formula. The formula is the sum of a constant and a variable.  The constant is usually 2.25 percent and the variable is a daily-changing interest rate called LIBOR.</p>
<p>The formula looks like this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">New Mortgage Rate = LIBOR + 2.250 percent</p>
<p>LIBOR is an acronym for London Interbank Offered Rate.  It&#8217;s an interest rate at which banks borrow money from each other. In Fall 2008, when Lehman Brothers fell and sparked a global banking fear, LIBOR spiked as the risk of inter-bank borrowing jumped. </p>
<p>Since then, however, LIBOR is down.</p>
<p>Normalcy is returning to banking and the timing couldn&#8217;t be better for homeowners with ARMs. 15 months ago, a homeowner&#8217;s ARM may have adjusted to 6 1/2 percent.  Today, that same ARM falls to just above 3.</p>
<p>As a strategy play, it might make sense to let your ARM adjust. Or, because fixed rates are still near 5 percent, converting that ARM to a long-term <em>fixed</em>-rate product might make sense, too.  The decision is a balance between how low do you want your payment, and how long might you live in your home.  </p>
<p>The longer you stay, the more it might make sense to switch to fixed-rate, even though ARM rates are so low.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got an adjusting ARM, talk to me about your choices. Once March ends and the Fed withdraws its mortgage market support, mortgage rates may rise and the fixed-rate option may be gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/10/dont-rush-to-refinance-that-arm-it-may-be-adjusting-to-3-percent-or-lower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Weeks Remain To Find A Home, Claim Up To $8,000 In Tax Credits</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/09/7-weeks-remain-to-find-a-home-claim-up-to-8000-in-tax-credits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/09/7-weeks-remain-to-find-a-home-claim-up-to-8000-in-tax-credits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1st-Time Buyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
In November, Congress extended and expanded the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit program to include a subset of &#8220;move-up&#8221; buyers &#8212; homeowners that have owned and lived in their home for 5 of the last 8 years.
The credit ranges up to $8,000 per buyer. There&#8217;s now just 7 weeks left to take advantage.
To be eligible, home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="7 Weeks Remain To Find A Home, Claim Up To $8,000 In Tax Credits" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10115"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="7 weeks remain for the Home Buyer Tax Credit Expiration" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/home-buyer-tax-credit-7-weeks.jpg" alt="7 weeks remain for the Home Buyer Tax Credit Expiration" width="220" height="275" />In November, Congress extended and expanded the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit program to include a subset of &#8220;move-up&#8221; buyers &#8212; homeowners that have owned and lived in their home for 5 of the last 8 years.</p>
<p>The credit ranges up to $8,000 per buyer. There&#8217;s now just 7 weeks left to take advantage.</p>
<p>To be eligible, home buyers must be under contract for a new home no later than April 30, 2010, and must be closed no later than June 30, 2010.</p>
<p>In addition to meeting the deadline dates, there&#8217;s a basic set of requirements to be tax credit-eligible:</p>
<ul>
<li>You can&#8217;t purchase the home from a parent, spouse, or child</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t purchase the home from an entity in which the seller is a majority owner</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t acquire the home by gift or inheritance</li>
<li>Each buyer in the purchase must meet eligibility requirements</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#8217;s other criteria, too.</p>
<p>For one, the sales price on the subject property cannot exceed $800,000. Homes sold for more than $800,000 are ineligible for the tax credit. Furthermore, households earning more than $125,000 as single-filers, or $225,500 for joint-filers, are ineligible.</p>
<p>You can read the complete eligibility requirements <a title="IRS details the home buyer tax credit" href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204671,00.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">at the IRS website</span></a>, or, you may just find it simpler to speak with your accountant about it. There are some nuances in qualifying for and claiming the tax credit on your returns and getting a professional&#8217;s opinion is always wise.</p>
<p>And lastly, don&#8217;t forget that government&#8217;s tax credit program is a true tax credit. It&#8217;s not a tax deduction.  This means that a tax filer whose &#8220;normal&#8221; tax liability is $3,500 and who is eligible for $8,000 in credit will receive a $4,500 refund from the U.S. Treasury.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re currently in the House Hunt, mark your calendar for April 30, 2010. It&#8217;s 7 weeks away and you can be sure that as the date gets closer, buyer traffic is going to increase.  You may find sellers more willing to negotiate today than several weeks from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/03/09/7-weeks-remain-to-find-a-home-claim-up-to-8000-in-tax-credits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How You Can Get The Most Accurate, Real-Time Mortgage Rate Quotes Available</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/24/how-you-can-get-the-most-accurate-real-time-mortgage-rate-quotes-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/24/how-you-can-get-the-most-accurate-real-time-mortgage-rate-quotes-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 

You can&#8217;t get your mortgage rates from the newspaper. Last week proved it.  Again.
Friday morning, headlines and around the country read that mortgage rates were down 0.04 percent, on average, since the week prior.
A sampling of said headlines includes:

US Mortgage Rates Drop For 2nd Straight Week (Reuters)
Mortgage Rates On 30-year US Loans Fall To 4.93% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="How You Can Get The Most Accurate, Real-Time Mortgage Rate Quotes Available" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10095"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Mortgage rates are expired before they hit the papers" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/expired-mortgage-rates.jpg" alt="Mortgage rates are expired before they hit the papers" width="232" height="224" /></p>
<p>You can&#8217;t get your mortgage rates from the newspaper. Last week proved it.  Again.</p>
<p>Friday morning, headlines and around the country read that mortgage rates were <a title="Freddie Mac PMMS Feb 18 2010" href="http://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/release.html?week=7&amp;year=2010" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">down 0.04 percent</span></a>, on average, since the week prior.</p>
<p>A sampling of said headlines includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>US Mortgage Rates Drop For 2nd Straight Week (<a title="Reuters headline on falling mortgage rates" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1835835620100218" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">Reuters</span></a>)</li>
<li>Mortgage Rates On 30-year US Loans Fall To 4.93% (<a title="Business Week story on falling mortgage rates" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-18/mortgage-rates-on-30-year-u-s-loans-fall-to-4-93-update2-.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">Business Week</span></a>)</li>
<li>30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate Falls Farther Below 5% (<a title="Marketwatch story on falling mortgage rates" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/30-year-fixed-rate-mortgage-falls-farther-below-5-2010-02-18" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">Marketwatch</span></a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>The story behind the headline was sourced from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey, am industry-wide mortgage rate poll of more than 100 lenders.  The PMMS has reported mortgage rate data to markets since 1971 and is the largest of its kind.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, rate shoppers can&#8217;t rely on it.</p>
<p>See, unlike governments and private-sector firms, when consumers are in need mortgage rate information, they need the information delivered in real-time; for making decisions on-the-spot.  Consumers need to know what rates are doing <em>right now</em>.</p>
<p>The Freddie Mac survey can&#8217;t offer that.</p>
<p>According to Freddie Mac, <a title="The PMMS methodology" href="http://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/abtpmms.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">the survey&#8217;s methodology</span></a> is to collect mortgage rates from lenders between Monday and Wednesday and to publish that data Thursday morning.  The survey results are an average of all reported mortgage rates. The problem is that mortgage rates change all day, every day.  The PMMS results are skewed, therefore, by methodology.</p>
<p>And, meanwhile, the issue was compounded last week because mortgage rates shot higher Wednesday afternoon &#8212; after the survey had &#8220;closed&#8221;.  The market deterioration ran into Thursday, too &#8212; again, unable to be captured by Freddie Mac&#8217;s PMMS.</p>
<p>Although the newspapers reported mortgage rates down last week, they weren&#8217;t.  Conforming mortgage rates were higher by at least 1/8 percent, or roughly $11 per $100,000 borrowed per month.  In some cases, rates were up by even more.</p>
<p>Newspapers and websites can give a lot of good information, but pricing is far too fluid to rely on a reporter. When you need to know what mortgage rates are doing in real-time, make sure you&#8217;re talking to a loan officer who&#8217;s tracking the market.  Call me at 240-223-1730 or shoot me an e-mail to <a href="mailto:tim@timromp.com">tim@timromp.com</a>.  Otherwise, you may just be getting yesterday&#8217;s news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/24/how-you-can-get-the-most-accurate-real-time-mortgage-rate-quotes-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separating FHA Fact From Fiction : Mortgage Insurance Premiums</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/10/separating-fha-fact-from-fiction-mortgage-insurance-premiums/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/10/separating-fha-fact-from-fiction-mortgage-insurance-premiums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1st-Time Buyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
The mortgage lending landscape changes a lot.  Rates and guidelines are in constant flux, and it creates preparedness challenges for buyers that aren&#8217;t paying in cash.
The loan you get today won&#8217;t always be the loan you get tomorrow.
Because of how frequently bank rules are changing, it can be hard for laypersons to distinguish between mortgage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Separating FHA Fact From Fiction : Mortgage Insurance Premiums" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10080"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="FHA asks Congress to raise Monthly MIP" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/fha-fact-fiction.jpg" alt="FHA asks Congress to raise Monthly MIP" width="180" height="239" />The mortgage lending landscape changes a lot.  Rates and guidelines are in constant flux, and it creates preparedness challenges for buyers that <em>aren&#8217;t </em>paying in cash.</p>
<p>The loan you get today won&#8217;t always be the loan you get tomorrow.</p>
<p>Because of how frequently bank rules are changing, it can be hard for laypersons to distinguish between mortgage fact and fiction of &#8220;what&#8217;s coming next&#8221;.</p>
<p>Recently, we saw this with respect to FHA home loans.</p>
<p>January 20, 2010, the FHA issued a press release with new lending guidelines.  Specifically, it announced 3 changes that will be effective starting April 5, 2010:</p>
<ol>
<li>Upfront mortgage insurance premiums increase from 1.75% to 2.25%</li>
<li>Allowable seller concession reduced from 6% to 3%</li>
<li>FICO scores of 580 or lower are subject to a minimum 10% downpayment</li>
</ol>
<p>But, also in <a title="FHA announcement on guideline changes" href="http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2010/HUDNo.10-016" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">its official statement</span></a>, the FHA announced it would ask Congress for permission to raise monthly mortgage insurance premiums.  This is where the rumors started.</p>
<p>Nestled on page 348 of the Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2011, in <a title="FHA asks Congress to raise Monthly MIP" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/topics.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">a section titled Special Topics</span></a>, there is a 1-paragraph notation that details the FHA&#8217;s petition. </p>
<ol>
<li>Raise monthly premiums by roughly 0.30%, or $25 per $100,000 borrowed per month</li>
<li>Lower upfront mortgage insurance premiums by 1.25%, or $1,250 per $100,000 borrowed at closing</li>
</ol>
<p>For now, the request is neither approved nor acknowledged by Congress. It&#8217;s merely a request. And in the event that Congress <em>does </em>approves it, that doesn&#8217;t mean that FHA has to stand by its initial projections.</p>
<p>Truth is, about the only thing we know about the future of FHA lending is that, come April 5, 2010, borrowing money is going to be tougher, and mortgage expensive. These are the facts as we know them today.</p>
<p>Homebuyers should plan accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/10/separating-fha-fact-from-fiction-mortgage-insurance-premiums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgage Approvals Are Getting More And More Scarce</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/09/mortgage-approvals-are-getting-more-and-more-scarce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/09/mortgage-approvals-are-getting-more-and-more-scarce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 

The economy&#8217;s improving but lending standards are not. Nationally, banks are making mortgage approvals harder to come by.
Underwriting guidelines are tightening.
The data comes from the Federal Reserve&#8217;s quarterly survey to its member banks.  The Fed asks senior bank loan officers around the country to report on &#8220;prime&#8221; residential mortgage guidelines over the most recent 3 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Mortgage Approvals Are Getting More And More Scarce" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10077"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Federal Reserve Quarterly Lending Survey 2007-2009" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/fed-bank-lending-survey-2009q4.png" alt="Federal Reserve Quarterly Lending Survey 2007-2009" width="216" height="302" /></p>
<p>The economy&#8217;s improving but lending standards are not. Nationally, banks are making mortgage approvals harder to come by.</p>
<p><a title="Federal Reserve Quarterly Lending Survey Q4 2009" href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/SnLoanSurvey/201002/fullreport.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">Underwriting guidelines are tightening</span></a>.</p>
<p>The data comes from the Federal Reserve&#8217;s quarterly survey to its member banks.  The Fed asks senior bank loan officers around the country to report on &#8220;prime&#8221; residential mortgage guidelines over the most recent 3 months and whether they&#8217;ve tightened.</p>
<p>For the period October-December 2009:</p>
<ul>
<li>Roughly 1 in 4 banks said guidelines tightened</li>
<li>Roughly 3 in 4 banks said guidelines were &#8220;basically unchanged&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Just 2 of 53 banks said its guidelines had loosened.</p>
<p>Combine the Fed&#8217;s survey with recent underwriting updates from <a title="New FHA guidelines for April 5 2010" name="FHA Streamline changes" href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/letters/mortgagee/files/10-02ml.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">the FHA</span></a> and generally tougher standards for conventional loans<a name="Fannie Mae underwriting changes" href="http://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/duguides/pdf/current/rndodu80.pdf" target="_blank"></a> and it&#8217;s clear that lenders are much more cautious about their loans than they were, say, in 2007.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s home buyers and would-be refinancers face a bevy of new borrowing hurdles including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Higher minimum FICO scores</li>
<li>Larger downpayment requirements for purchases</li>
<li>Larger equity positions for refinances</li>
<li>Lower debt-to-income ratios</li>
</ul>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re on the fence about whether now is a good time to buy a home, or make that refi, consider acting sooner rather than later.  It doesn&#8217;t necessarily matter that mortgage rates are low, or that there&#8217;s an up-to-$8,000 home purchase tax credit for households that qualify.  With each passing quarter, fewer and fewer applicants are eligible to take advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/09/mortgage-approvals-are-getting-more-and-more-scarce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple Real Estate Definitions : Short Sale</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/02/simple-real-estate-definitions-short-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/02/simple-real-estate-definitions-short-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
A &#8220;Short Sale&#8221; is when a home seller sells his home for a lesser amount than what is owed on his mortgage, and the mortgage lender agrees to accept the lesser amount in lieu of a full payoff.
By way of example, a Short Sale may be appropriate for a home seller whose mortgage balance is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Simple Real Estate Definitions : Short Sale" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10067"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="Short Sale Definition" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/short-sale-definition.jpg" alt="Short Sale Definition" width="230" height="142" />A &#8220;Short Sale&#8221; is when a home seller sells his home for a lesser amount than what is owed on his mortgage, and the mortgage lender agrees to accept the lesser amount in lieu of a full payoff.</p>
<p>By way of example, a Short Sale may be appropriate for a home seller whose mortgage balance is $250,000 but whose home wouldn&#8217;t sell for more than $220,000.  Rather than pay the $30,000 difference to the lender at the time of sale, the seller enters into an agreement with the lender by which all sale proceeds are paid to the bank and the deficient balance is forgiven.</p>
<p>Short Sales are a preferable alternative to foreclosure but the process still harms both parties. For one, the seller is penalized with a derogatory tradeline on credit for not fulfilling a mortgage obligation. And, two, the lender is forced to take a loss on a mortgage loan.  Versus an executed foreclosure, however, Short Sale damages are relatively limited on both sides.</p>
<p>For this reason, Short Sales are sometimes considered &#8220;the economical alternative&#8221; to default.</p>
<p>The process of getting a Short Sale approved varies from lender-to-lender and can be time-intensive. Home sellers should not go at it alone &#8212; speaking with a real estate agent about the proper protocol is usually the best place to start.  And sellers should be aware of how a Short Sale on their credit can impact future borrowing.</p>
<p>Current Fannie Mae guidelines prevent short-selling homeowners from obtaining new mortgage financing for a period of 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/02/02/simple-real-estate-definitions-short-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring 2010 FHA Guidelines Make Borrowing Tougher And More Expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/21/spring-2010-fha-guidelines-make-borrowing-tougher-and-more-expensive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/21/spring-2010-fha-guidelines-make-borrowing-tougher-and-more-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1st-Time Buyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
Securing an FHA mortgage is about to get more expensive.
In a statement issued Wednesday, the Federal Housing Authority outlined policy changes to its mortgage assistance program. The shift is meant to both reduce the government group&#8217;s portfolio risk while strengthening its overall financials.
For consumers, the changes mean higher costs.
As listed in the official announcement, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Spring 2010 FHA Guidelines Make Borrowing Tougher And More Expensive" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10051"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="New FHA guidelines" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/FHA-in-2010-2.jpg" alt="New FHA guidelines" width="235" height="198" />Securing an FHA mortgage is about to get more expensive.</p>
<p>In a statement issued Wednesday, the Federal Housing Authority outlined policy changes to its mortgage assistance program. The shift is meant to both reduce the government group&#8217;s portfolio risk while strengthening its overall financials.</p>
<p>For consumers, the changes mean higher costs.</p>
<p>As listed in <a title="FHA announcement on guideline changes" href="http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2010/HUDNo.10-016" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">the official announcement</span></a>, there are 3 major guideline updates for the FHA:</p>
<ol>
<li>Upfront mortgage insurance premiums are increasing to 2.25% from 1.75%</li>
<li>Minimum downpayments for applicants with sub-580 FICOs are rising to 10 percent</li>
<li>Seller concessions are being limited to 3%, down from today&#8217;s allowable 6%</li>
</ol>
<p>Furthermore, the FHA has appealed to Congress to raise an FHA borrowers&#8217; monthly mortgage insurance premiums.</p>
<p>To read the FHA&#8217;s statement, it&#8217;s clear what the group is trying to balance.  On one side, the FHA wants to provide affordable financing to families that need it. That&#8217;s its <a title="FHA review on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Housing_Administration" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">mission statement</span></a>. On the other side, though, the FHA must manage the risk that comes with insuring lesser-quality loans.</p>
<p>To that end, the FHA is stepping up its enforcement of &#8220;bad lenders&#8221; in hopes of stopping problems where they start.</p>
<p>Also in its new policies, the FHA is introducing a &#8220;termination clause&#8221; that states if banks or loan officers produce more than their fair share of bad loans, they will lose their right to originate FHA mortgages.</p>
<p>As a result, homebuyers should expect tougher FHA underwriting in 2010. Not because the FHA says so, necessarily, but because banks don&#8217;t want to do &#8220;bad loans&#8221;.  Lenders are incented to turn down at-risk applicants and, already, we&#8217;re seeing examples of this. Despite FHA allowing 580 FICOs and lower, many banks have made 620 their minimum.</p>
<p>Some have other guideline overlays, too.</p>
<p>The FHA&#8217;s new guidelines don&#8217;t go into effect until this spring.  So, between now and then, the old guidelines still apply.  Therefore, if you know you&#8217;re going to need an FHA home loan in the next few months, consider moving up your time-frame.</p>
<p>If nothing else, you&#8217;ll save some money at closing <em>and</em> on your monthly payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/21/spring-2010-fha-guidelines-make-borrowing-tougher-and-more-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s 100 Days Left To Claim The Homebuyer Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/20/theres-100-days-left-to-claim-the-homebuyer-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/20/theres-100-days-left-to-claim-the-homebuyer-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1st-Time Buyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
November 6, 2009, Congress voted to extend and expand the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit program.  There&#8217;s 100 days left to claim it.
The expiration date of the up-to-$8,000 tax credit has been pushed forward to spring, requiring homebuyers to be under contract for a home no later than April 30, 2010, and to be closed no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="There" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10049"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="100 days remain for the Home Buyer Tax Credit Expiration" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/home-buyer-tax-credit-100-days.jpg" alt="100 days remain for the Home Buyer Tax Credit Expiration" width="220" height="275" />November 6, 2009, Congress voted to extend and expand the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit program.  There&#8217;s 100 days left to claim it.</p>
<p>The expiration date of the up-to-$8,000 tax credit has been pushed forward to spring, requiring homebuyers to be under contract for a home no later than April 30, 2010, and to be closed no later than June 30, 2010.</p>
<p>In addition, &#8220;move-up&#8221; buyers were also added to the program&#8217;s eligibility list meaning you don&#8217;t have to be a first-time home buyer to be eligible for the tax credit.  If you&#8217;ve lived in your home for 5 of the last 8 years, you meet the IRS requirements.</p>
<p>Move-up buyers are capped at a total tax credit of $6,500.</p>
<p>The tax credit&#8217;s basic eligibility requirements remain the same:</p>
<ul>
<li>You can&#8217;t purchase the home from a parent, spouse, or child</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t purchase the home from an entity in which they&#8217;re a majority owner</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t acquire the home by gift or inheritance</li>
<li>All parties to the purchase must meet eligibility requirements</li>
</ul>
<p>The new law includes some notable updates, however. </p>
<p>First, the subject property&#8217;s sales price may not exceed $800,000. Homes sold for more than $800,000 are ineligible.  And, also, household income thresholds have been raised to $125,000 for single-filers and $225,500 for joint-filers.</p>
<p>And lastly, don&#8217;t forget that the program is a true tax credit &#8212; not a deduction.  This means that a tax filer who&#8217;s eligible for the full $8,00 credit and whose &#8220;normal&#8221; tax liability totals $5,000 would receive a $3,000 refund from the U.S. Treasury at tax time.</p>
<p>The complete list of qualifying criteria is <a title="IRS details the home buyer tax credit" name="IRS.gov" href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204671,00.html" target="_blank">posted on the IRS website</a>.  Review it with a tax professional to determine your eligibility.  Then mark your calendar for April 30, 2010.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just 100 days to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/20/theres-100-days-left-to-claim-the-homebuyer-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking At The 2010 Predictions For Housing Markets And Mortgage Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/05/looking-at-the-2010-predictions-for-housing-markets-and-mortgage-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/05/looking-at-the-2010-predictions-for-housing-markets-and-mortgage-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[1st-Time Buyers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
2010 is just a few days old and already the &#8220;experts&#8221; are making predictions for the year.
Housing calls and mortgage rate predictions run the gamut:

Home prices will fall in 2010
Home prices will rise in 2010
Mortgage rates will rise in 2010
Mortgage rates will rise by a lot in 2010

Given how varied their outlooks, it&#8217;s clear that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="Looking At The 2010 Predictions For Housing Markets And Mortgage Rates" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=10029"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: black 1px solid;" title="2010 housing and mortgage predictions are guesses" src="http://bringtheblog.com/i/crystal-ball.png" alt="2010 housing and mortgage predictions are guesses" width="220" height="246" />2010 is just a few days old and already the &#8220;experts&#8221; are making predictions for the year.</p>
<p>Housing calls and mortgage rate predictions run the gamut:</p>
<ul>
<li>Home prices <a title="CNNMoney story on 2010 home prices" href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/31/real_estate/home_price_drop/index.htm" target="_blank">will fall in 2010</a></li>
<li>Home prices <a title="USA Today story on rising home values" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2009-11-13-realtors-rising-home-prices_N.htm" target="_blank">will rise in 2010</a></li>
<li>Mortgage rates <a title="Washington Post story on mortgage rates in 2010" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/25/AR2009122501652.html" target="_blank">will rise in 2010</a></li>
<li>Mortgage rates <a title="Morgan Stanley predicts 8% rates in 2010" href="http://business.nashvillepost.com/2009/12/29/morgan-stanley-mortgage-rates-to-jump-in-10/" target="_blank">will rise by a lot</a> in 2010</li>
</ul>
<p>Given how varied their outlooks, it&#8217;s clear that the professionals have no better view of the future than the amateurs. An expert can make an educated guess, but it&#8217;s a guess nonetheless.</p>
<p>Last year, Wall Streeters predicted a 25% pullback in home prices. 12 months later, we know prices didn&#8217;t fall.  Wall Street also predicted higher mortgage rates for 2009. That prediction <em>was</em> fulfilled.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of talk on CNBC and elsewhere about what&#8217;s coming in 2010. Before you take those predictions to the bank, just remember that analysts do a much better job interpreting data from the past than projecting it into the future.</p>
<p>The only thing that&#8217;s certain right now is that mortgage rates are historically low, the government is giving tax credits to qualified buyers, and there are a lot of good &#8220;deals&#8221; in housing. Make the most of what&#8217;s out there today because it will take 12 months for us to look back and know which predictions were right and which were wrong.</p>
<p>Until then, predictions are just opinions and guesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2010/01/05/looking-at-the-2010-predictions-for-housing-markets-and-mortgage-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Increase Your 2009 Mortgage Interest Tax Deduction</title>
		<link>http://www.timromp.com/2009/12/08/how-to-increase-your-2009-mortgage-interest-tax-deduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timromp.com/2009/12/08/how-to-increase-your-2009-mortgage-interest-tax-deduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Romp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timromp.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
For many American homeowners, interest paid on a mortgage is tax-deductible in the year in which it was paid.
Knowing that, eligible homeowners can increase their 2009 tax deductions just by making their January 2010 mortgage payment before the end of the year.
By paying in 2009, the mortgage interest paid can be applied against 2009&#8217;s itemized tax deductions even though [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a title="How To Increase Your 2009 Mortgage Interest Tax Deduction" rel="bookmark" href="http://tromp.thewrittenblog.com/?p=4034"></a></h2>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="http://www.thewrittenblog.com/main_1/images/mailbox_2_(smal_1228884410.jpg" border="0" alt="Mail your January 2009 mortgage payment in December 2008 to get an extra tax deduction" hspace="5" align="right" />For many American homeowners, interest paid on a mortgage <a href="http://taxes.about.com/od/deductionscredits/a/MortgageDeduct.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">is tax-deductible</span></a> in the year in which it was paid.</p>
<p>Knowing that, eligible homeowners can increase their 2009 tax deductions just by making their January 2010 mortgage payment before the end of the year.</p>
<p>By paying in 2009, the mortgage interest paid can be applied against 2009&#8217;s itemized tax deductions even though the payment isn&#8217;t technically due until 2010.</p>
<p>It can reduce your tax burden come <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Day" target="_blank"><span style="color: #023419;">Thursday, April 15, 2010</span></a>.</p>
<p>And lest you think you&#8217;re paying the mortgage &#8220;in advance&#8221;, remember that mortgage interest is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrears"><span style="color: #023419;">paid in arrears</span></a>; a payment due January 1 accounts for interest that accumulated in December 2009 anyway. </p>
<p>Tax planning is a complicated issue and not all homeowners qualify for mortgage interest tax deductions. Check with your tax professional before making tax planning decisions.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have an accountant you trust, call or email me anytime; I&#8217;m happy to make a recommendation to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timromp.com/2009/12/08/how-to-increase-your-2009-mortgage-interest-tax-deduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
